LME GERMANY Liebl Motorsport Engineering

Motorsport vehicle development and vehicle dynamics

Leading a vehicle programme and owning the engineering inside it.

Dominic Liebl leads development programmes for high-performance vehicles. Before that, chief designer of an LMP1 in the FIA WEC and performance engineer in a DTM manufacturer programme.

Hypercar programme
Development lead
FIA WEC 2015
Chief Designer
DTM manufacturer programme
Performance engineer
GT3 · DTM · F4 · W Series
Race engineer
In motorsport since
2006

Development leadership

An overview of every single part.

From 2023 to 2026 I technically led and coordinated the development of two hypercar programmes, as an external mandate through LME. Project and budget planning were my responsibility, as were product structure, bill of materials and procurement.

A vehicle programme rarely fails over a calculation. It fails because nobody keeps track of thousands of parts — design status, order status, lead time — so decisions arrive too late.

My answer is unspectacular and effective: schedule, cost and bill of materials all hang off the same source. The BOM is derived from the CAD structure rather than maintained by hand, delay is calculated rather than reported, and every budget line states its basis — quoted price, reference price or estimate.

  1. Target and concept

    Set targets, interpret the regulations, validate the concept against both.

  2. Project and schedule planning

    Work packages, durations and milestones with RACI assignment across all development partners. Delay is calculated: plan against plan, deviation in days.

  3. Budget and cost planning

    Budgets per work package, planned against actual, cash flow per calendar week, reported against plan at regular intervals.

  4. Bill of materials (BOM) and procurement

    The BOM as the leading document, derived from the CAD structure: supplier, quote comparison, part and setup cost, lead time and order status per item.

  5. Maturity and release states

    A process stage per part, release states frozen and traceable, order status visible in the model itself.

  6. Quality and risk (QMS)

    Reconciliation against the production partner's quality master. Offered as a service: QMS concept work plus FMEA facilitation and risk assessment.

One environment instead of five islands

My core task in the last programme was not the individual part but what connects them: CAD, bill of materials, procurement, project planning and quality status exchange their data automatically and in both directions. A change in the model reaches the BOM, the order status reaches the model, maturity reaches the schedule.

The purpose is not elegance but headcount. What takes five departments and as many systems in a large organisation can be kept in view by a handful of people — and kept current daily rather than weekly.

Data loop between CAD, bill of materials, procurement, planning and quality Five areas are connected through a shared data source at the centre; the connections run in both directions. one data source CAD BOM PROCUREMENT PLANNING QM bi-directional · automated · current daily
Methods and tools
  • BOM
  • CAD2BOM
  • RACI
  • Gantt
  • MS Project
  • Milestone planning
  • Budget planning
  • Cost tracking
  • FMEA
  • QMS
  • ISO 31000
  • ISO 26262
  • ISO 9001 / IATF 16949

For clarity: FMEA facilitation, risk assessment and QMS concept work are offered as services. Standards are my frame of reference, not a seal — bills of material, drawing states and release documentation are delivered so that a quality system run to ISO 9001 or IATF 16949 can absorb them without rework. I hold no certification of my own.

Services

The depth those decisions come from.

Concept, design, simulation and track work sit with the same person. Each of these disciplines is also available as a standalone engagement.

01

Vehicle concept

Rule interpretation, targets, package and overall layout — from the regulations to a verified installation space.

  • LMP1
  • LMH / LMDh
  • GT
  • Rallye-Raid
02

Design & CAD

Bodywork, monocoque, suspension and drivetrain in CATIA V5 and 3DEXPERIENCE, including composite and tooling design.

  • CATIA V5
  • 3DEXPERIENCE
  • Composite
  • Tooling
03

Aerodynamics & CFD

An in-house OpenFOAM chain: meshing, solver runs, force coefficients and variant comparison, evaluated in ParaView.

  • OpenFOAM
  • ParaView
  • snappyHexMesh
  • LIC
04

Vehicle dynamics & simulation

Kinematics layout and hardpoint optimisation, lap time simulation and driver-in-the-loop operation.

  • MATLAB
  • ADAMS
  • Lap time sim
  • DIL
05

Race & performance engineering

Trackside work: setup, test programmes, data analysis and competitor analysis.

  • MoTeC
  • PI Toolbox
  • WinTAX4
  • RaceStudio2
06

In-house IT

Project data and documents in a self-operated cloud system on machines at the company's own address, including an in-house office suite. A separate area per project with advanced user permissions; workstations and cloud storage are also available to rent.

  • Nextcloud
  • Euro Office
  • 2FA enforced
07

Software and programming

Complete applications and tools in MATLAB, in use in motorsport: data analysis, reporting, calculation chains and design tools. Alongside that, two own Android applications developed and distributed through the Google Play Store, and freelance teaching in MATLAB.

  • MATLAB
  • App Designer
  • BordLog
  • ThesLog
  • Courses

Rent workstations

Big runs do not need a big provider.

Three in-house Linux workstations, bookable by the hour for your own runs — CFD with OpenFOAM, for instance, but equally FEA or any other compute-heavy work. You get your own user account and set up your computing environment inside it. Billing follows the machine's running time.

Workstation 1
Linux Mint
Cores
44 physical · 88 Threads
RAM
881 GB
Graphics
4 GB · 1124 MHzdisplay only, no solver
Workstation 2
Linux Mint
Cores
36 physical · 72 Threads
RAM
755 GB
Graphics
headless, compute only
Workstation 3
Linux Mint
Cores
36 physical · 72 Threads
RAM
755 GB
Graphics
headless, compute only
72 cores · 1.5 TB RAM Workstations 2 + 3 combined
116 cores · 2.4 TB RAM all three workstations combined
Shared across all three workstations
4.3 TB shared project storage
10 GbE between nodes
NVMe local to each workstation

Bookings are per workstation. The machines are linked by a 10-gigabit network with shared project storage; a run coupled across several workstations is agreed beforehand. Independently of that, project storage in the in-house cloud system can be rented — your own area, advanced user permissions, mandatory two-factor sign-in.

Memory is the real point here. 881 GB on a single node is exactly what gets disproportionately expensive at the large providers: big meshes, transient runs and cases that would otherwise have to be split up all run on one machine. CFD and FEA alike decompose onto physical cores, not threads — which is why it says 116 and not 232.

Prices and availability on request.

How a booking works

  1. Enquire and order

    You describe what needs computing. No open registration.

  2. Access is set up

    Access is created personally and released for the compute workstations.

  3. Set up your environment

    Solvers, tooling and any licences are yours to bring.

  4. Book and compute

    Pick a slot, the machine powers up by itself. Remote access, browser terminal or SSH — tied to the booking.

  5. Billed by running time

    Usage record as a PDF, ready to attach to an invoice.

Who else can reach your data

Anyone sending design data out of house wants to know where it sits and who can see it.

  • One account per client

    your own user account and working directory — nothing shared.

  • Encrypted on all three routes

    HTTPS with its own certificate, SSH over VPN, remote access through a relay server that sits here.

  • Sign-in with a second factor

    either an authenticator app or a hardware security key.

  • The key expires with the booking

    removed when the booking ends; every account is set up by hand.

  • Outside access only with your consent

    only if you allow it in the portal. No tick, no access.

  • The data stays here

    machines at the company's own address, no third-party cloud, nothing passed on.

What is different here
  • billed on running time
  • 881 GB RAM on one node
  • no third-party cloud
  • your own choice of software

The booking portal and sign-in run on a server I operate myself, inside the EU. The workstations do not run around the clock — outside your booking they are switched off. What is rented is the compute power, not a ready-made environment.

Rent cloud storage

Every project finds the same structure in place.

The file service runs on Nextcloud on hardware I own, at the company's own address in Germany, with access through a server of my own inside the EU — no large cloud provider is involved. It is built for documents, drawings and reports; data sets in the tens of gigabytes do not belong on the line but stay where the computing happens.

Top level, identical in every area
  • 00_INTERNAL
  • 02_CHASSIS&BODY
  • 05_POWERTRAIN
  • 08_AERODYNAMICS
  • 30_PROCEDURES
  • 90_REGULATIONS
  • … and more, depending on the programme

Not an empty folder

Every customer area is set up along the same numbered scheme: chassis, powertrain, aerodynamics, electronics, procedures, regulations, imagery. The top level carries the same numbers and names everywhere, and the second level follows the same pattern.

It sounds like a detail and is not one once a programme is running: anyone looking for a drawing looks in the same place in every project — and anyone filing one does not have to decide where it goes.

  • Released folder by folder

    Access is not granted for a whole area at once but folder by folder. Whatever is not explicitly released to a named person stays closed, including newly created folders.

  • Permissions from a matrix

    Which person sees which folder is recorded per customer in an access matrix. The server re-reads it every five minutes and sets permissions accordingly — nothing is maintained by hand.

  • One area per customer

    Each customer works in their own project area. Other customers' areas do not appear in their file list.

  • Traceable over a year

    Creating, changing, moving and deleting are recorded with time and account in the service's history, going back over the past year.

  • Protection against slips

    Deleted files stay in the recycle bin for 30 days, and earlier versions of edited files are kept. That covers accidental deletion and overwriting.

  • Second factor required

    Every personal account requires a second factor in addition to the password — authenticator app, security key or one-time code.

Documents can be edited in the browser, collaboratively, on a document server of my own. Large simulation data sets stay where the computing happens: the compute workstations are attached to a shared project store at ten gigabit, while results and reports go through the cloud.

LMP1 in the WEC

From the wiring loom to the complete car.

From March 2014 to September 2015 at Kodewa / ByKolles Racing on the LMP1 programme in the FIA World Endurance Championship. Less than ten months passed between joining as system and data engineer and taking responsibility for the complete car as chief designer.

Three-quarter front-left view of a black and gold LMP1 race car carrying race number 9 on an illuminated show stand
CLM P1/01 · 2014 · Season livery

Systems and data, then design

Entry point in vehicle electronics: programming the electronic components, looking after the entire sensor system, data analysis with race engineers and drivers. Layout of the wiring loom with the company that built it.

Alongside that, design of mechanical parts — cooling ducts, brake ducting, wing attachments, pedal box, housings for control units and sensors. For the 2014 crash test campaign, planning of the tests to FIA procedure, design of the test fixtures, coordination with the test house and the report the next steps were decided on. For the August wind tunnel run, drawings of measurement rig parts.

Trackside attendance at tests and race meetings. At the WEC finale in São Paulo in November 2014, first outing as race engineer on the car.

Left-hand side view of a grey LMP1 race car with neon yellow accents on nose, sill and rear wing
CLM P1/01 · 2015 · Developed version

Chief designer

From early 2015, chief designer and head of the engineering group. For the 2015 season, responsibility for the design of the complete car: carbon bodywork, the tooling to produce it, and the mechanical parts. Layout of the new race gearbox together with the gearbox and engine manufacturers, and involvement in the layout and design of the new suspension.

The car carried the same type designation in both years: CLM P1/01. What went racing in 2015 was a developed version of the same car, not a new one.

Hypercars at Apollo

Four cars across eight years.

From 2015 to 2023, involved in four hypercar projects as an external mandate through LME Germany — sometimes on a single component, sometimes on the suspension and gearbox of a whole car, latterly on the trackside test programme.

White and black Apollo N supercar in three-quarter front-right view, with a large rear wing and front splitter
Apollo N · 2015

Specification, clamshell, set-up

Vehicle specification, design of the rear clamshell and full vehicle dynamics simulation in in-house software. Trackside aerodynamic measurements and suspension set-up, plus the gearbox software together with its manufacturer.

Orange Apollo Arrow supercar in side view
Apollo Arrow · 2016

Specification, bodywork, suspension, gearbox

Vehicle specification and design of the bodywork. Suspension from simulation through specification to design, gearbox in simulation and specification; full vehicle dynamics in in-house software.

Silver Apollo Intensa Emozione supercar in three-quarter front-left view, with blue accents on brake calipers and aerodynamic parts
Apollo Intensa Emozione · 2022 – 2023

Test programme, cooling, interior

Test programme 2022 and 2023, cooling optimisation, specification of the racing interior.

Red and orange Apollo EVO supercar in side view
Apollo EVO · 2022 – 2023

Cooling, active aero, active ride height

Leadership of the test programme, specification and optimisation of the cooling package, specification of the active aerodynamics, layout of the active ride height control together with a damper manufacturer.

Hypercars at De Tomaso

Two programmes, 2023 to 2026.

Development leadership for two vehicle programmes as an external mandate through LME Germany. The work covered the layout of suspension and kinematics and of the bodywork components, CFD calculations and vehicle dynamics on hardware and software of my own, coordination with component suppliers and support in procurement. See the overview of leadership tasks.

Gold-liveried De Tomaso P72 sports car in three-quarter front-right view
De Tomaso P72 · 2023 – 2026

P72

Responsible as Independent Head of Development during the concept phase. Drafting of the technical specification to the client's requirements.

Purple and gold De Tomaso P900 prototype in three-quarter front-left view
De Tomaso P900 · 2023 – 2026

P900

Leadership as Independent Head of Development across the programme. Layout of suspension and kinematics and of the bodywork components, CFD calculations and vehicle dynamics on hardware and software of my own, coordination with component suppliers and support in procurement. Every assembly designed through and delivered as a release-ready drawing set.

Own work

Under my own power, down to the last iteration.

The work in this section was created without a client: self-initiated, self-funded, pushed over years.

CAD rendering of the LME18 LMP1 prototype from the rear quarter, showing diffuser and rear wing
LME18 · 2015 – 2018 · Complete vehicle

An LMP1 from a blank sheet

Begun as the LME17 concept study and developed into the LME18 — the car for the 2018 season. A complete LMP1 prototype to the FIA regulations, started without a client and taken as far as an investor commitment. It ended when Audi and Porsche withdrew from the category.

Photo of the completed LME17AI: autonomous 1:5 scale model of the LMP1, painted red and yellow
LME17AI · the car as built, one-fifth scale

The model that drives itself

The LME18 spawned a one-fifth-scale car that is not remote-controlled but drives itself. It maps the circuit for the simulator, measures track roughness and transmits everything in real time. A driver can steer it from the simulator — while the control system learns from those inputs.

CFD post-processing: streamline field around the prototype body with velocity and pressure scales
OpenFOAM · ParaView

Aerodynamics on an in-house chain

Instead of off-the-shelf software, a self-built chain: scripted meshing and solver control, evaluation in numbered report series. Every iteration is reproducible — same sections, same scales. Validated against the Ahmed body reference case.

CATIA view of the complete vehicle with the assembly tree of its main groups and overlaid streamlines
CATIA V5 · ParaView streamlines inside the model

A structure the whole team can read

The tooling base behind it: a binding product structure, an in-house material catalogue, a standard-part library and self-written CATVBA tools for bills of material, mass and centre of gravity. Regulatory articles sit in the model as check volumes.

Three moves save the most time. Streamlines from ParaView are brought back into the CATIA model, so aerodynamics is discussed on the part itself rather than in an image viewer. Procurement status is visible in colour inside the assembly. And the structure follows the vehicle's real build sequence, linked to delivery dates — open the assembly and you see whether the next assembly step has even been delivered.

CAD rendering of the LME23 LMDh concept study, front view, unpainted
LME23 · 2021 – 2023

The next rule set: LMDh

The LME23, a prototype study within the LMDh framework: bodywork, underfloor, front splitter, cooling ducts and rear end as a surface model, regulatory geometry as check volumes, the spec gearbox as an installation constraint.

App development

Two applications of my own.

Concept, implementation, maintenance and distribution in-house — from data storage through the interface to billing in the store.

BordLog app emblem: a silver cube lettered BordLog, topped with a sports car, a notebook and a fuel pump

BordLog

Electronic driver's logbook for Android — from single use to a fleet with several drivers and vehicles. Multilingual, syncing through a cloud account of your own rather than a third-party service.

ThesLog app emblem: a silver cube lettered ThesLog, topped with a stack of flashcards and a globe

ThesLog

Flashcard-based vocabulary trainer for Android. Your own card sets, testing in both directions, progress tracked per card.

Profile

Dominic Liebl

Trained coachbuilder, then mechanical engineering with a vehicle-technology focus through to M.Sc. In motorsport since 2006 — from data engineer in karting through LMP1 to leading development of high-performance vehicles.

In 2015, chief designer of the LMP1 car CLM P1/01 in the FIA World Endurance Championship: continuing its design and development, and building the electronics, aerodynamics and design groups from scratch.

From 2017 to 2020, performance engineer in the BMW DTM programme, based at BMW Motorsport in Munich: lap time simulation, competitor analysis and technical interface to the three DTM crews. For the 2020 season, liaison and performance engineer trackside with the privately entered BMW DTM customer team, responsible for Robert Kubica's car.

Two technical books on race car dynamics and lap time optimisation. Lecturer for CATIA V5 and MATLAB.

  • 2015 – today LME Germany Owner · development leadership and engineering
  • 2023 – 2026 Development lead, De Tomaso P72 · P900 · through LME Germany
  • 2021 – today Race Engineer W Series · GT World Challenge · DTM · Lamborghini Super Trofeo · Formula 4 CEZ
    freelance through LME Germany
  • 2017 – 2020 Performance engineer, DTM Reinhold Motorsport · at BMW Motorsport, Munich
  • 2015 – 2023 Hypercar projects, Apollo N · Arrow · Intensa Emozione · Evo · through LME Germany
  • 2015 Chief Designer, LMP1 Kodewa / ByKolles Racing · CLM P1/01 · FIA WEC
  • 2014 System & data engineer Kodewa · Lotus LMP1
  • 2014 Simulation specialist, vehicle dynamics TESIS DYNAware
  • 2012 / 2013 B.Eng. · M.Sc. Mechanical engineering Regensburg · vehicle technology
  • 2008 – 2012 Data engineer & driver coach Jenzer Motorsport · Formula Renault 2.0
  • 2001 – 2005 Coachbuilder apprenticeship Completed with distinction · chamber prize

Contact

Enquiries about programme and scope.

Two kinds of conversation interest me most: one about a development leadership role that needs filling, permanent or interim, and one about a specific technical problem that is stuck.

Three details help: which vehicle or programme, what needs to be achieved, and by when. Working languages are German and English.

E-Mail
info@lme-germany.de
Telephone
+49 170 7751237
Provider
Dominic Liebl Motorsport Engineering Germany
Owner: Dominic Liebl
Schützenheimweg 17
93173 Wenzenbach
Germany
VAT ID
DE221093007
Elsewhere

Provider identification under § 5 DDG. Legal form, liability notices, image credits and the consumer dispute resolution statement are in the full legal notice.